Movie Names
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Maryada Ramanna Views :204 Reviewed By Mahesh Babu | Rating |
![]() |
|
Story: An entertaining tale, the story begins with a faction murder in Rayalaseema and the victim’s brother Ramineedu (nagineedu) vows revenge on the killer’s family. However, the killer dies and his wife escapes with her son. Scene change and 28 years later, the city of Hyderabad has Ramu (sunil), a young man who doesn’t have parents and is struggling hard for livelihood. His fate takes a turn when he is notified of a land in his native village in Rayalaseema. He decides to sell that and buy an auto trolley. He sets off to his village and it is here that Ramineedu and his sons (supreeth, venugopal) live. Meanwhile, Ramu meets Aparna (saloni) in his journey and she happens to be the daughter of Ramineedu. A twist of fate and sequence of events land him at the home of Ramineedu and they also discover his true identity. What happens from there forms the rest of the story.
Sunil shoulders his role very responsibly and though he has been marked as a comedian, he has shown that he can be a good lead as well. Another asset to the film is Saloni, her sensuous looks and oomph factor give a lot of visual appeal, incidentally she has not resorted to any skin show but raised the heat in her own way. Nagineedu was an apt choice for his role, Supreeth was effective and Venugopal was convincing, Brahmaji made his presence felt. Kanchi gave few light moments. Jayavani was regular, Anita Nath was as usual, Sandhya was standard, Subbaraya Sharma was okay, Rao Ramesh was not given due screen space, the others did their bit as required.
Minus points: predictable storyline plot revealed soon Analysis: The film runs on a predictable storyline but then it is the ability of the director to make it interesting to the audience that scores. The narrative was impressive and presentation was good. Dialogues were alright, the script was tight and the screenplay was executed smoothly. Background score was energetic and two songs were good. Cinematography was appealing and costumes were apt. Art department made its presence felt strongly. Editing was neat. Though there are few key places where the film could have been better and created a strong impact, overall this will pass off with all classes of audience.
|
|
| Post User Comments | |
| User Comments |











